![](http://expert.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/giganet_banner-900x90-2.png")
A recent incident in California vividly demonstrated the dangers of over-reliance on artificial intelligence, especially in situations that require real-world skills and experience. Three seasoned tourists who relied on advice Google Gemini regarding a route to climb Mount Shasta, became trapped on the mountainside, which later required a police rescue operation.
AI miscalculations
Before setting off on a hike, the hikers asked Gemini for a recommended route and estimated climbing time. The AI assured them that the climb would take about 8 hours and advised them to bring easily digestible carbohydrates rather than fats, explaining that fats “take too long to digest.”
However, the reality turned out to be much more complicated than the AI predicted. Having started the climb at 3 a.m., the hikers intended to reach the summit around 11 a.m. Instead, they only reached it at 7 p.m., spending almost 16 hours on the climb. This significantly exceeded the expectations formed based on the information from Gemini.
Consequences of wrong advice
The descent in the dark also proved problematic. Due to a deviation from the planned route, the group ended up in Mud Creek Canyon, where one of the hikers suffered a knee injury. The complication of the situation and the impossibility of a safe descent forced them to seek help from the police.
Rescuers were able to find and safely remove the group from the mountainous terrain only the next morning. Interestingly, one of the victims had the All Trails navigation app installed on his phone, but was unable to use it due to a low battery.
Overreliance on AI
After the rescue, the tourists confessed to rescuers: “We relied too much on AI and didn’t make our own conclusions.” The incident once again highlighted the limitations of artificial intelligence in high-risk situations.
While tools like Gemini can quickly gather publicly available information from the web, they lack real-world experience climbing a specific mountain. AI cannot account for changing weather conditions, snow conditions, the actual difficulty of a route, or a person’s fitness. Moreover, AI is powerless to provide assistance in the event of unforeseen situations, such as injuries.
Safety recommendations
Artificial intelligence can be a useful tool for information and planning, but it should not be the sole source of advice for life-threatening activities such as mountaineering or long hikes.
This is especially true for critical information such as routes, weather forecasts, rescue services, and necessary equipment. In such cases, you should always turn to trusted sources:
- Local governing bodies and national parks.
- Professional mountain guides.
- Current data from verified meteorological services.
Additionally, it’s always a good idea to set aside extra time and resources for emergencies. Real-world security requires critical thinking, experience, and real-world situational awareness, not just digital advice.
